[ Pdf Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft ☆ sao-tome-and-principe PDF ] by Jürgen Habermas · loveonline.pro

[ Pdf Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft ☆ sao-tome-and-principe PDF ] by Jürgen Habermas · This Is J Rgen Habermas S Most Concrete Historical Sociological Book And One Of The Key Contributions To Political Thought In The Postwar Period It Will Be A Revelation To Those Who Have Known Habermas Only Through His Theoretical Writing To Find His Later Interests In Problems Of Legitimation And Communication Foreshadowed In This Lucid Study Of The Origins, Nature, And Evolution Of Public Opinion In Democratic Societies Several important influences on Habermas s work are evident Firstly, he borrows many important terms and categories from Kant, Hegel and Marx Many of his ways of thinking about the public sphere are explicitly Kantian, and he develops Hegel s central category of civil society into the basis from which public opinion emerges Of these, Kant is perhaps the greatest influence, simply because for Habermas his work represents the fully developed theory of the public sphere.
The Marxist cultural theory of the Frankfurt School is also an important influence, particularly on the second part of the Structural Transformation.
The Frankfurt School was a group of philosophers linked to the Institute of Social Research in Frankfurt, active from the 1920s on Two of its most famous names were Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno The Frankfurt Habermas bourgeois pubic sphere is a seminal contribution to the Frankfurt School.
This is the ur text of publics theory I m glad I read it, like I m glad when I eat healthy food.
If this wasn t assigned reading I probably would ve enjoyed this muchthat or I would ve never picked it up I m glad it s over anyways.
okay, yes its dense and wordy and translated from german but it kind of is like a political sociology epic poem smash together my high school modern european history class from high school with my freshman year college political philosophy course with the word bourgeois sprinkled throughout and you get a flavor its fun to watch the public sphere evolve from feudalism to high industrial capitalism era i m sure i didnt glean whole swaths of it, but what i did get i enjoyed.
Second Review Habermas presents a strong case for understanding the history of the public sphere tied primarily to the interests of a bourgeois reading class during the Liberal era roughly mid 18th 10th centuries , evolving out of a coffeehouse and salon culture and then mutating into different forms that eroded the rational critical aspect of the public sphere while and by expanding democratic political participation.
What Habermas means by the public sphere is a rational critical space where educated and propertied which were almost universally the same thing during this period individuals could gather together to discuss issues of common interest literary, artistic, political, economic, social, etc The central aspect of this public sphere was a debate between educated people which was ostensibly stripped of social rank and deference, and conducted entirely on the basis Habermas, you re a helluva humanist thinker I can t complain about the man s motives this is the sort of qualitative commentary that stands on its own merits rather than feeling like the speculations of some dude in a bourgeois university position in Paris or New York.
But when he tries to claim that the public sphere has degenerated from its role in the early capitalist era, I have to question Habermas work To what extent did this public sphere play a role in the expansion of justice, and to what extent did it simply protect its own neck Looking for a Golden Age is almost always a bad idea, and I m afraid Habermas slips into this trap His analysis of how consumers receive rather than debate culture remain Retold in fairy tale language for a class assignmentIn a distant past, there existed a feudal society, and in this society, there was not yet a public sphere In fact, public referred to nobility, and everyone else was common 6 However, with the rise of capitalism and the bourgeois class came the commercial trade in news 15 , and a public sphere began to emerge between the private sphere of life and the government 23 This public sphere was composed of the bourgeoisie, mostly male property owners, who used reason to debate public issues 27 29 In western Europe and America, these citizens engaged in dialogue in coffee shops, newspapers, and letters that is, they debated in largely private spaces that created publics Public opinion began to develop, but this wasn t the public opinion we conceive of today instead, it was formed through public debate, not thro I forgot to put in that I read this, because I got so swept up in school So the thing about this is that I had to read the book and then in the next week my class and I had to read different articles all about the problems with the text and it was my job to discuss all the articles that found all the problems and talk about it at length I don t really know how to rate or even talk about this book, because I can t say that I enjoyed it but I do understand why it s an important foundation Even in all the articles we went over that talked about the problems with the text it still applauded what Habermas did as groundbreaking So all at once I don t get it and I do get it It s not a super clear argument, but is doing something important so I don t know I m kind of middle of the road about it.

Categories sao tome and principe 0 comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *